Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İki Faktörlü İçselleştirilmiş Kilo Önyargısı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 68 - 75, 31.12.2022

İlayda Esin , Mehmet Haşim Akgül

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı, İki Faktörlü İçselleştirilmiş Kilo Önyargısı Ölçeğinin (İKÖÖ-2F) psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenerek Türkçeye uyarlanmasıdır. Araştırmanın amacına ulaşmak için üç farklı örneklem belirlenmiştir. Bunlardan birincisi açımlayıcı faktör analizinin yapıldığı toplamda 230 spor veya egzersiz yapan bireylerden oluşan örneklem grubu, ikincisi doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve ek analizlerin yapıldığı 267 spor veya egzersiz yapan bireylerden oluşan örneklem grubu ve üçüncüsü ise test tekrar test analizlerinin yapıldığı 30 spor veya egzersiz yapan bireylerden oluşan örneklem grubudur. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde IBM SPSS Statistics 22 ve Jamovi 2.3.7. paket programı kullanılmıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda İKÖÖ-2F’nin kiloyla ilişkili stres ve kiloyla ilişkili kendilik değeri olmak üzere iki alt boyutlu bir yapıya sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ölçeğin iki faktörlü yapısı toplam varyansın %55,19’unu açıklamaktadır. Güvenirliğin sınanması amacıyla elde edilen Cronbach Alpha katsayısı ölçeğin toplamı için 0,80, kiloyla ilişkili stres alt boyutu için 0,89 ve kiloyla ilişkili kendilik değeri alt boyutu için ise 0,76 olarak bulunmuştur. Ayrıca kararlılığın incelenmesi amacıyla yapılan test tekrar test analiz sonuçlarında ölçeğin ölçüm değerlerinin değişim göstermediği saptanmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre ise uyum indeksleri, modelin kabul edilebilir ve mükemmel uyum aralığında olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç olarak, araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular İKÖÖ-2F’nin Türk katılımcı örnekleminde içselleştirilmiş kilo önyargısı düzeyinin belirlenebilmesi için kullanılabilir bir ölçek olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Keywords

kilo önyargısı içselleştirilmiş kilo önyargısı egzersiz spor

References

  • Angoff, W. H. (1988). Validity: An evolving concept. In H. Wainer ve H. Braun (Ed.). Test validity (s. 19-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (8. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • De Zwaan, M., Petersen, I., Kaerber, M., Burgmer, R., Nolting, B., Legenbauer, T. ve Herpertz, S. (2009). Obesity and quality of life: a controlled study of normal-weight and obese individuals. Psychosomatics, 50(5), 474-482.
  • Durso, L. E., ve Latner, J. D. (2008). Understanding self-directed stigma: Development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity, S80-S86. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.448
  • Flint, S. W., Raisborough, J., ve Hudson, J. (2020). The implications of weight bias internalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3019.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling.
  • Latner JD, Durso LE, Mond JM. (2013). Health and health-related quality of life among treatment-seeking overweight and obese adults: associations with internalized weight bias. J Eat Disord 1:1–6.
  • Lawson JL, LeCates A, Ivezaj V, et al. (2020). Internalized weight bias and loss-of-control eating following bariatric surgery. Eat Disord J Treat Prev. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2020. 1731920.
  • Lillis J, Levin ME, Hayes S (2011) Exploring the relationship between BMI and health-related quality of life: a pilot study of the impact of weight self-stigma and experiential avoidance. J Health Psychol 16(5):722–727. doi:10.1177/1359105310388321
  • Meadows, A., ve Higgs, S. (2019). The multifaceted nature of weight-related self-stigma: validation of the two-factor weight bias internalization scale (WBIS-2F). Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 808.
  • Papadopoulos S, Brennan L. (2015). Correlates of weight stigma in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic literature review. Obesity. 23:1743–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21187.
  • Pollack, A. (2015). AMA recognizes obesity as a disease. NYTimescom; 2013.
  • Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pearl RL. (2020). Weight stigma as a psycho-social contributor to obesity. Am Psychol. 75:274–89. https:// doi.org/10.1037/amp0000538.
  • Puhl, R. ve Brownell, K. D. (2001). Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity research, 9(12), 788-805.
  • Roberto CA, Sysko R, Bush J, Pearl R, Puhl RM, Schvey NA, Dovidio JF (2012) Clinical correlates of the weight bias internalization scale in a sample of obese adolescents seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity 20(3):533–539. doi:10.1038/oby.2011.123
  • Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J. ve Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20(4), 294-320. doi:10.1521/soco.20.4.294.19908
  • Scherer, R. F., Luther, D. C., Wiebe, F. A., ve Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological reports, 62(3), 763-770.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA (Vol. 724). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
  • Tomiyama A.J. (2014). Weight stigma is stressful: A review of evidence for the Cyclic Obesity/Weight-Based Stigma model. Appetite, 82, 8–15. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.108
  • Vartanian L.R. ve Shaprow J.G. (2008) Effects of weight stigma on exercise motivation and behavior a preliminary investigation among college-aged females. J Health Psychol 13(1):131–138. doi:10.1177/1359105307084318
  • Wang, S. S., Brownell, K. D. ve Wadden, T. A. (2004). The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. International Journal of Obesity, 28(10), 1333-1337. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802730

Two-Factor Weight Bias Internalization Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Year 2022, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 68 - 75, 31.12.2022

İlayda Esin , Mehmet Haşim Akgül

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the psychometric properties of Two-Factor Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-2F) and to bring it to Turkish literature. Three different examples have been identified to achieve the purpose of the research. The first is a group of examples of individuals who have done 230 sports or exercises in total, where the descriptive factor analysis is done, the second is a group of examples of individuals who have done 267 sports or exercise, where additional analysis is done, and the third is a group of 30 sports or exercise people who have done test-retest. IBM SPSS Statistics 22 and Jamovi 2.3.7. were used in the analysis of the obtained data. The exploratory factor analysis determined that WBIS-2F has a two-factor structure, which is weight-related stress and weight-related self-devaluation. The two-factor structure of the scale describes 55.19% of the total variance. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient obtained to test reliability was found at a total of 0.80 of the scale, subscale of 0,89 of weight-related stress and subscale of 0,76 of weight-related self-devaluation. In addition, it has been determined that the scale has not changed in the test retest analysis results for reliability purposes. According to the results of the confirmatory factor analysis, index of fit the model is acceptable and within the perfect range. As a result, the findings from the study found that WBIS-2F is a measure that can be used to determine the weight bias internalization level in the example of Turkish sports or exercise individuals.

Keywords

weight bias weight bias internalization exercise sport

References

  • Angoff, W. H. (1988). Validity: An evolving concept. In H. Wainer ve H. Braun (Ed.). Test validity (s. 19-32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (8. Baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • De Zwaan, M., Petersen, I., Kaerber, M., Burgmer, R., Nolting, B., Legenbauer, T. ve Herpertz, S. (2009). Obesity and quality of life: a controlled study of normal-weight and obese individuals. Psychosomatics, 50(5), 474-482.
  • Durso, L. E., ve Latner, J. D. (2008). Understanding self-directed stigma: Development of the Weight Bias Internalization Scale. Obesity, S80-S86. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.448
  • Flint, S. W., Raisborough, J., ve Hudson, J. (2020). The implications of weight bias internalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3019.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling.
  • Latner JD, Durso LE, Mond JM. (2013). Health and health-related quality of life among treatment-seeking overweight and obese adults: associations with internalized weight bias. J Eat Disord 1:1–6.
  • Lawson JL, LeCates A, Ivezaj V, et al. (2020). Internalized weight bias and loss-of-control eating following bariatric surgery. Eat Disord J Treat Prev. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2020. 1731920.
  • Lillis J, Levin ME, Hayes S (2011) Exploring the relationship between BMI and health-related quality of life: a pilot study of the impact of weight self-stigma and experiential avoidance. J Health Psychol 16(5):722–727. doi:10.1177/1359105310388321
  • Meadows, A., ve Higgs, S. (2019). The multifaceted nature of weight-related self-stigma: validation of the two-factor weight bias internalization scale (WBIS-2F). Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 808.
  • Papadopoulos S, Brennan L. (2015). Correlates of weight stigma in adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic literature review. Obesity. 23:1743–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21187.
  • Pollack, A. (2015). AMA recognizes obesity as a disease. NYTimescom; 2013.
  • Puhl RM, Himmelstein MS, Pearl RL. (2020). Weight stigma as a psycho-social contributor to obesity. Am Psychol. 75:274–89. https:// doi.org/10.1037/amp0000538.
  • Puhl, R. ve Brownell, K. D. (2001). Bias, discrimination, and obesity. Obesity research, 9(12), 788-805.
  • Roberto CA, Sysko R, Bush J, Pearl R, Puhl RM, Schvey NA, Dovidio JF (2012) Clinical correlates of the weight bias internalization scale in a sample of obese adolescents seeking bariatric surgery. Obesity 20(3):533–539. doi:10.1038/oby.2011.123
  • Rudman, L. A., Feinberg, J. ve Fairchild, K. (2002). Minority members' implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition, 20(4), 294-320. doi:10.1521/soco.20.4.294.19908
  • Scherer, R. F., Luther, D. C., Wiebe, F. A., ve Adams, J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological reports, 62(3), 763-770.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Experimental designs using ANOVA (Vol. 724). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Brooks/Cole.
  • Tomiyama A.J. (2014). Weight stigma is stressful: A review of evidence for the Cyclic Obesity/Weight-Based Stigma model. Appetite, 82, 8–15. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.108
  • Vartanian L.R. ve Shaprow J.G. (2008) Effects of weight stigma on exercise motivation and behavior a preliminary investigation among college-aged females. J Health Psychol 13(1):131–138. doi:10.1177/1359105307084318
  • Wang, S. S., Brownell, K. D. ve Wadden, T. A. (2004). The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. International Journal of Obesity, 28(10), 1333-1337. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802730
There are 21 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Sports Medicine
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

İlayda Esin 0000-0001-7987-7312

Mehmet Haşim Akgül 0000-0002-4665-9615

Publication Date December 31, 2022
Submission Date October 10, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022Volume: 3 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Esin, İ., & Akgül, M. H. (2022). İki Faktörlü İçselleştirilmiş Kilo Önyargısı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 68-75.
 Download Cover Image

s