Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

RELATIONSHIPS AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SOCIAL INTEGRATION LEVEL IN SPORT AND PERSONALITY TYPES

Year 2019, Volume: 17 Issue: 4, 233 - 249, 30.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.633004

Abstract

Personality traits
influence behavior and motivation related to social integration. For this
reason, this research is important in terms of the fact that the sport which is
thought to be a social environment and provides the socialization of
individuals will contribute to the development of personality traits and as a
tool to help psychologists. The aim of this study is to investigate the
relationships and interactions between the level of social integration in
sports and personality types. In this study, relational survey model, one of
the quantitative research methods, was used. The research group of this study
consists of 152 female and 148 male high school and university students who
study in sports sciences in Niğde province, selected by convenience
(accidental) sampling method and criteria sampling method from random sampling
methods. Survey method was used as data collection tool. The first part of the
three-part questionnaire contains the "social integration scale in
sports" developed by Yilmaz et al. (2007), the second part contains the
personality types scale adapted to Turkish by Sudak and Zehir (2013) developed
by Goldberg (1990), and the third part contains the personal data form. In addition
to descriptive statistics in the analysis of the data; normality tests, Pearson
correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis were used. In
addition, the Z score was calculated and the differences between the groups
were examined in order to compare the r values that appeared in the binary
correlation analysis by dividing them into groups. As a result of the analysis,
significant positive correlations were found between the sub-dimensions of the
two measurement instruments at low, medium and high levels in general. As a
result, sports are a very important tool for the development of personality
along with the social integration of individuals.

References

  • Allen M. S., Greenlees I., Jones, M. (2013). Personality in sport: A comprehensive review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 184–208. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2013.769614
  • Bayar P. (2003). Spor yapan ve yapmayan bayanların kişilik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(3), 133-143.
  • Berger R. A., Littlefield D. H. (1969). Comparison between football athletes and nonathletes on personality. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 40(4), 663-665.
  • Berkman L. F. (1995). The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 245-254.
  • Berry D. S., Hansen J. S. (2000). Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 278 –292.
  • Brissette I., Cohen S., Seeman T. E. (2000). Measuring social integration and social networks. Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists, 53, 85.
  • Burger J.M. (2006). Kişilik psikoloji biliminin insan doğasına dair söyledikleri (Çev.İnan Deniz Erguvan Sarıoğlu). Kaktüs Psikoloji.
  • Büyükbasmacı Y. E., Tazegül Ü. (2016). Düzenli Olarak Spor Yapan ve Yapmayan Bireylerin Sosyotropik-Otonomik Kişilik Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (37), 611-617.
  • Büyüköztürk Ş., Çakmak E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1-360.
  • Cohen S., Underwood L.G., Gottlieb B. H. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 53-85). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
  • Cohen S., Wills T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
  • Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: Is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of Personality, 55(2), 299-316.
  • Devecioglu S., Sahan H., Yildiz M., Tekin M., Sim H. (2012). Examination of socialization levels of university students engaging in individual and team sports. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 326-330.
  • Digman J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246.
  • Dobersek U., Bartling C. (2008). Connection between personality type and sport. American Journal of Psychological Research, 4 (1), 21- 28.
  • Doğan T. (2013). Beş faktör kişilik özellikleri ve öznel iyi oluş. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(1), 56-64. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00284.x
  • Duriez B., Soenens B., Beyers W. (2004). Personality, identity styles, and religiosity: An integrative study among late adolescents in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Personality, 72, 877–910. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00284.x
  • Eagleton J. R., McKelvie S. J., De Man A. (2007). Extra version and neuroticism in team sport participants, individual sport participants, and nonparticipants. Perceptual and motor skills, 105(1), 265-275.
  • Elmose-Østerlund K, Ørnulf S., Ramon L, Jan-Willem V.D.R., Jenny A.Z., Siegfried N. (2019). Social integration in sports clubs: individual and organisational factors in a European context, European Journal for Sport and Society, DOI: 10.1080/16138171.2019.1652382
  • Eraslan M. (2015). Spor Bölümlerinde Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişilik Özelliklerinin ve Stresle Başa Çıkma Stillerinin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(12), 65-82.
  • Erikson E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
  • Eysenck H.J., Eysenck S.B.G. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  • Fletcher R, Dowell L. (1971). Selected Personality Characteristics of High School Athletes and Nonathletes, The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 77:1, 39-41, DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1971.9916852
  • Foulkes, S. H. (2018). Introduction to group-analytic psychotherapy: Studies in the social integration of individuals and groups. Routledge.
  • Frieder R. E., Wang G., Oh I. S. (2018). Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 324.
  • Fulkerson J. A., Keel P. K., Leon G. R., Dorr T. (1999). Eating‐disordered behaviors and personality characteristics of high school athletes and nonathletes. International journal of eating disorders, 26(1), 73-79.
  • Goldberg L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1216.
  • Goldthorpe J. H. (2017). Social inequality and social integration. In Social Policy and Public Policy (pp. 32-40). Routledge.
  • Hall D. A. (2004). A Comparative Study of Perceptions of Participants and Non-Participants in a Campus Recreation Program on the Quality of Students’ College Experiences. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Pacific, California, USA.
  • Harris M. A., Brett C. E., Starr J. M., Deary I. J., Johnson, W. (2016). Personality and other lifelong influences on older‐age health and wellbeing: Preliminary findings in two Scottish samples. European journal of personality, 30(5), 438-455.
  • Hittner J. B., Penmetsa N., Bianculli V., Swickert R. (2020). Personality and substance use correlates of e-cigarette use in college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109605.
  • Ilyasi G., Salehian M. H. (2011). Comparison of personality traits between individual and team athletes. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 9(4), 527-530.
  • Jensen-Campbell L.A., Graziano W.G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. J. Personal, 69, 323–61.
  • Jocklin V., McGue M., Lykken D. T. (1996). Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 288.
  • Judge T. A., Higgins C. A., Thoresen C. J., Barrick M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the lifespan. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652.
  • Jung J. (1995). Ethnic group and gender differences in the relationship between personality and coping. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 8(2), 113-126.
  • Kaplan T., Aktaş S., Tükel Y., Atılgan D. (2017). Rekreasyonel Olarak Aktif Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişilik Tiplerinin İncelenmesi. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 135-144.
  • Karaca M. (2012). Farklılaşma, bütünleşme ve birlikte yaşama üzerine. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 18.
  • Karasar N. (2016) Bilimsel Araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar ilkeler teknikler. 31. Baskı Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Küçük V., Koç H. (2004). Psiko-sosyal gelişim süreci içerisinde insan ve spor ilişkisi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (10).
  • Levine I, Stokes JP. (1986). An examination of the relation between individual difference variables to loneliness. Journal of Personality, 54, 717-733.
  • McCrae R. R. (1992). The five-factor model: Issues and applications (Special issue). Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
  • McNair D.M., Lorr M., Droppleman L.F. (1971). Profile of Mood States Manual. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service
  • Nia M. E., Besharat M. A. (2010). Comparison of athletes’ personality characteristics in individual and team sports. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 808-812. http://doi.org/bwx652
  • Özdil M. (2017). Kolektif ve bireysel kimlikler bağlamında sosyal bütünleşme. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 28(3).
  • Özgen F. (2016). Spor yapan ve yapmayan üniversite öğrencilerinde internet bağımlılığı ile kişilik ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çanakkale.
  • Passer M. Smith R., Holt N., Bremner, A., Sutherland E., Vliek M. (2009). Psychology The Science of Mind and Behaviour. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Newcombe P.A., Boyle G.J. (1995). High school students' sports personalities: Variations across participation level, gender, type of sport, and success. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 277-294: ISSN 0047-0767.
  • Sato M., Jordan J.S., Funk D.C., Sachs M.L. (2018). Running involvement and life satisfaction: The role of personality, Journal of Leisure Research, 49(1), 28-45, DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2018.1425051
  • Schultz D.P, Schultz S. E. (2005). Theories of Personality. Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning.
  • Seeman T. E. (1996). Social ties and health: The benefits of social integration. Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 442-451.
  • Shariati M., Bakhtiari S. (2011). Comparison of personality characteristics athlete and non-athlete student, Islamic Azad University of Ahvaz. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2312-2315.
  • Sudak M. K., Zehir C. (2013). Kişilik tipleri, duygusal zekâ, iş tatmini ilişkisi üzerine yapılan bir araştırma. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(22), 141-165.
  • Şahan H. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyalleşme sürecinde spor aktivitelerinin rolü. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2008(2), 248-266.
  • Ulseth, A. B. (2004). Social integration in modern sport: Commercial fitness centres and voluntary sports clubs, European Sport Management Quarterly, 4(2), 95-115, DOI: 10.1080/16184740408737471
  • Yazgan İnanç B., Yerlikaya E.E. (2015). Kişilik Kuramları. Pegem Akademi.
  • Yılmaz B., Karlı Ü., Yetim A. A. (2006). Sporda sosyal bütünleşme ölçeği (SSBÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(4), 3-10.
  • Yüksel Ö. (2006). Davranış Bilimleri, Ankara, Gazi Kitapevi.
  • Zweig D., Webster J. (2004). What are we measuring? An examination of the relationships between the big-five personality traits, goal orientation, and performance intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1693-1708.

SPORDA SOSYAL BÜTÜNLEŞME DÜZEYİ İLE KİŞİLİK TİPLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER VE ETKİLEŞİMLER

Year 2019, Volume: 17 Issue: 4, 233 - 249, 30.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.633004

Abstract

Bu
çalışma spor yapan ve yapmayan bireyler arasındaki kişilik tipleri ve sosyal
bütünleşme düzeylerinin incelenmesi amacı ile yapılmıştır. Bu araştırmada genel
tarama modellerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın
grubunu liselerde 2018-2019 eğitim öğretim döneminde öğrenim gören lise 1, 2, 3
ve 4 sınıf 152 kadın 148 erkek olmak üzere toplam 300 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır.
Grup oluşumu, seçkisiz olmayan örnekleme yöntemlerinden uygun (kazara)
örnekleme yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı
olarak anket kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada kullanılacak olan anket formları
araştırmacı tarafından yüz yüze görüşme yöntemiyle bireylere ulaştırılmıştır.
Bu araştırmada: bireylerin demografik özellikleri elde etmek için ‘Kişisel Bilgi
Formu’ kullanıldı. Ayrıca bireylerin, kişilik tiplerini belirlemek için,
Goldberg (1999) tarafından geliştirilen, “Kişilik Tipleri Ölçeği” ve bireylerin
sporda bütünleşme düzeylerini ölçmek için, Yılmaz ve ark. (2007) tarafından
geliştirilen “Sporda Sosyal Bütünleşme Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada elde
edilen veriler SPSS programı aracılığıyla bilgisayar ortamında analiz edildi. Sonuç
olarak, cinsiyet, eğitin durumu, lisanslı sporcu olup/olmama durumu, spor türü
ve sağlık amaçlı spor yapma değişenlerine göre kişilik tipleri ve sporda
bütünleşme ölçek toplam puanları açısından anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur.
Bununla birlikte, yaş ve ölçek alt boyutları arasında da düşük ve orta düzeyde
pozitif ilişki olduğu rapor edilmiştir.

References

  • Allen M. S., Greenlees I., Jones, M. (2013). Personality in sport: A comprehensive review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 184–208. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2013.769614
  • Bayar P. (2003). Spor yapan ve yapmayan bayanların kişilik özelliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(3), 133-143.
  • Berger R. A., Littlefield D. H. (1969). Comparison between football athletes and nonathletes on personality. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 40(4), 663-665.
  • Berkman L. F. (1995). The role of social relations in health promotion. Psychosomatic Medicine, 57, 245-254.
  • Berry D. S., Hansen J. S. (2000). Personality, nonverbal behavior, and interaction quality in female dyads. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 278 –292.
  • Brissette I., Cohen S., Seeman T. E. (2000). Measuring social integration and social networks. Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists, 53, 85.
  • Burger J.M. (2006). Kişilik psikoloji biliminin insan doğasına dair söyledikleri (Çev.İnan Deniz Erguvan Sarıoğlu). Kaktüs Psikoloji.
  • Büyükbasmacı Y. E., Tazegül Ü. (2016). Düzenli Olarak Spor Yapan ve Yapmayan Bireylerin Sosyotropik-Otonomik Kişilik Düzeylerinin Karşılaştırılması. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4 (37), 611-617.
  • Büyüköztürk Ş., Çakmak E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Atıf İndeksi, 1-360.
  • Cohen S., Underwood L.G., Gottlieb B. H. (2000). Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 53-85). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
  • Cohen S., Wills T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
  • Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. (1987). Neuroticism, somatic complaints, and disease: Is the bark worse than the bite? Journal of Personality, 55(2), 299-316.
  • Devecioglu S., Sahan H., Yildiz M., Tekin M., Sim H. (2012). Examination of socialization levels of university students engaging in individual and team sports. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 326-330.
  • Digman J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246.
  • Dobersek U., Bartling C. (2008). Connection between personality type and sport. American Journal of Psychological Research, 4 (1), 21- 28.
  • Doğan T. (2013). Beş faktör kişilik özellikleri ve öznel iyi oluş. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 14(1), 56-64. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00284.x
  • Duriez B., Soenens B., Beyers W. (2004). Personality, identity styles, and religiosity: An integrative study among late adolescents in Flanders (Belgium). Journal of Personality, 72, 877–910. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00284.x
  • Eagleton J. R., McKelvie S. J., De Man A. (2007). Extra version and neuroticism in team sport participants, individual sport participants, and nonparticipants. Perceptual and motor skills, 105(1), 265-275.
  • Elmose-Østerlund K, Ørnulf S., Ramon L, Jan-Willem V.D.R., Jenny A.Z., Siegfried N. (2019). Social integration in sports clubs: individual and organisational factors in a European context, European Journal for Sport and Society, DOI: 10.1080/16138171.2019.1652382
  • Eraslan M. (2015). Spor Bölümlerinde Öğrenim Gören Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişilik Özelliklerinin ve Stresle Başa Çıkma Stillerinin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(12), 65-82.
  • Erikson E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
  • Eysenck H.J., Eysenck S.B.G. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  • Fletcher R, Dowell L. (1971). Selected Personality Characteristics of High School Athletes and Nonathletes, The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 77:1, 39-41, DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1971.9916852
  • Foulkes, S. H. (2018). Introduction to group-analytic psychotherapy: Studies in the social integration of individuals and groups. Routledge.
  • Frieder R. E., Wang G., Oh I. S. (2018). Linking job-relevant personality traits, transformational leadership, and job performance via perceived meaningfulness at work: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(3), 324.
  • Fulkerson J. A., Keel P. K., Leon G. R., Dorr T. (1999). Eating‐disordered behaviors and personality characteristics of high school athletes and nonathletes. International journal of eating disorders, 26(1), 73-79.
  • Goldberg L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1216.
  • Goldthorpe J. H. (2017). Social inequality and social integration. In Social Policy and Public Policy (pp. 32-40). Routledge.
  • Hall D. A. (2004). A Comparative Study of Perceptions of Participants and Non-Participants in a Campus Recreation Program on the Quality of Students’ College Experiences. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Pacific, California, USA.
  • Harris M. A., Brett C. E., Starr J. M., Deary I. J., Johnson, W. (2016). Personality and other lifelong influences on older‐age health and wellbeing: Preliminary findings in two Scottish samples. European journal of personality, 30(5), 438-455.
  • Hittner J. B., Penmetsa N., Bianculli V., Swickert R. (2020). Personality and substance use correlates of e-cigarette use in college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, 109605.
  • Ilyasi G., Salehian M. H. (2011). Comparison of personality traits between individual and team athletes. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 9(4), 527-530.
  • Jensen-Campbell L.A., Graziano W.G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. J. Personal, 69, 323–61.
  • Jocklin V., McGue M., Lykken D. T. (1996). Personality and divorce: A genetic analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 71(2), 288.
  • Judge T. A., Higgins C. A., Thoresen C. J., Barrick M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the lifespan. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 621-652.
  • Jung J. (1995). Ethnic group and gender differences in the relationship between personality and coping. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 8(2), 113-126.
  • Kaplan T., Aktaş S., Tükel Y., Atılgan D. (2017). Rekreasyonel Olarak Aktif Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kişilik Tiplerinin İncelenmesi. Spor ve Performans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(2), 135-144.
  • Karaca M. (2012). Farklılaşma, bütünleşme ve birlikte yaşama üzerine. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gokalp Education Faculty, 18.
  • Karasar N. (2016) Bilimsel Araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar ilkeler teknikler. 31. Baskı Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Küçük V., Koç H. (2004). Psiko-sosyal gelişim süreci içerisinde insan ve spor ilişkisi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (10).
  • Levine I, Stokes JP. (1986). An examination of the relation between individual difference variables to loneliness. Journal of Personality, 54, 717-733.
  • McCrae R. R. (1992). The five-factor model: Issues and applications (Special issue). Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175-215.
  • McNair D.M., Lorr M., Droppleman L.F. (1971). Profile of Mood States Manual. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Service
  • Nia M. E., Besharat M. A. (2010). Comparison of athletes’ personality characteristics in individual and team sports. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 808-812. http://doi.org/bwx652
  • Özdil M. (2017). Kolektif ve bireysel kimlikler bağlamında sosyal bütünleşme. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 28(3).
  • Özgen F. (2016). Spor yapan ve yapmayan üniversite öğrencilerinde internet bağımlılığı ile kişilik ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Çanakkale.
  • Passer M. Smith R., Holt N., Bremner, A., Sutherland E., Vliek M. (2009). Psychology The Science of Mind and Behaviour. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Newcombe P.A., Boyle G.J. (1995). High school students' sports personalities: Variations across participation level, gender, type of sport, and success. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 277-294: ISSN 0047-0767.
  • Sato M., Jordan J.S., Funk D.C., Sachs M.L. (2018). Running involvement and life satisfaction: The role of personality, Journal of Leisure Research, 49(1), 28-45, DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2018.1425051
  • Schultz D.P, Schultz S. E. (2005). Theories of Personality. Wadsworth, a division of Thomson Learning.
  • Seeman T. E. (1996). Social ties and health: The benefits of social integration. Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 442-451.
  • Shariati M., Bakhtiari S. (2011). Comparison of personality characteristics athlete and non-athlete student, Islamic Azad University of Ahvaz. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2312-2315.
  • Sudak M. K., Zehir C. (2013). Kişilik tipleri, duygusal zekâ, iş tatmini ilişkisi üzerine yapılan bir araştırma. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(22), 141-165.
  • Şahan H. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin sosyalleşme sürecinde spor aktivitelerinin rolü. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2008(2), 248-266.
  • Ulseth, A. B. (2004). Social integration in modern sport: Commercial fitness centres and voluntary sports clubs, European Sport Management Quarterly, 4(2), 95-115, DOI: 10.1080/16184740408737471
  • Yazgan İnanç B., Yerlikaya E.E. (2015). Kişilik Kuramları. Pegem Akademi.
  • Yılmaz B., Karlı Ü., Yetim A. A. (2006). Sporda sosyal bütünleşme ölçeği (SSBÖ) geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(4), 3-10.
  • Yüksel Ö. (2006). Davranış Bilimleri, Ankara, Gazi Kitapevi.
  • Zweig D., Webster J. (2004). What are we measuring? An examination of the relationships between the big-five personality traits, goal orientation, and performance intentions. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1693-1708.
There are 59 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Sports Medicine
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ercan Polat 0000-0002-4892-2616

Halil Erdem Akoğlu 0000-0002-0818-7143

Hanifi Üzüm 0000-0002-0555-266X

Publication Date December 30, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 17 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Polat, E., Akoğlu, H. E., & Üzüm, H. (2019). SPORDA SOSYAL BÜTÜNLEŞME DÜZEYİ İLE KİŞİLİK TİPLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER VE ETKİLEŞİMLER. SPORMETRE Beden Eğitimi Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(4), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.633004

Flag Counter